Amal's Roles: Change or Practical Divide

The article is based on the idea that Hezbollah's emergence from within Amal Movement was not a natural birth of a successor resembling the original, but rather reflects an increasing differentiation between the two in defining their roles and boundaries. Since its founding, Amal Movement has been built on principles of participation in the state and alleviating deprivation. Currently, it is moving toward greater distinction, reaffirming its commitment to Lebanese sovereignty and the legacy of Imam Musa al-Sadr. In contrast, Hezbollah remains linked to a doctrinal and strategic vision that ties its presence in Lebanon to a broader regional equation and the authority of the religious jurist. This distinction is clearly evident in their differing positions on the general amnesty issue and in parliamentary work, where Amal aims to preserve Lebanese institutions and security, while Hezbollah emphasizes its role as a military and resistance component. Additionally, Nabih Berri’s stance reflects an increasing awareness of the reality of international and regional balances, with a clear orientation toward strengthening Lebanese sovereignty while maintaining political influence. This indicates the beginning of a shift in the intersection of roles within the Shiite duo, highlighting emerging risks and challenges, but also a desire to establish Amal’s independence and to define boundaries of distinction from Hezbollah.

articleDetails.fontSize.sizeحجم النص

تنويه: هذا ملخص تم إنشاؤه بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

عرض المقال بالكامل